Does advertising
use a myth of glamour to change society or mirror it?
Advertising,
the act or practice of calling public attention to one's product, but is
this really what twenty first century advertising is about. Are we simply
buying a product for need or necessity, or is it something altogether
different, are we buying into an idea, a myth of the way we should or would
want to live our lives. Has society changed so dramatically that we cannot be
content with who we are, the way we look the clothes we wear and even the way
we smell. Does advertising package and distribute the ideological glamor life
style we all find our selves drawn to if only to avoid the realisation of our
own miserable existence, but surely as a society we are not so susceptible to
by the nonsense that is shovelled down our throats as if to readying us for the
slaughter house. Perhaps modern advertising is a critical evaluation of the way
we live our lives and therefor is a reflection on the western consumerist
society besieged upon us. Although could it be the cultural we find our selves
apart of is what drives the way we are advertised too, twenty first century
advertising is just feeding the beast within. ‘Advertisements are one of the
most important cultural factors moulding and reflecting our life today’ (Judith Williamson, 2005, page 11). I
will be exploring these two points; I will focus my investigation on perfume
and the advertising of perfume. Do people believe that buying water scented
with various chemicals will lead to success, it will make them good looking and
ultimately happy, or is it simply this idea of glamour that sells us our dreams.
‘As Joseph Goebbels said: This is the secret of propaganda:
those who are to be persuaded by it should be completely immersed in the idea
of the propaganda’ (Jean Kilbourne, 2006)
Glamorous,
beautiful even gorgeous, are all words that could be describe the ideal male or
female body, but who can achieve this, is it possible, probably not. Perfume
retailers rely on the dissatisfaction with life to sell their products, ‘ads
gleam with promise of transformation and transcendence via material objects’ (Jean Kilbourne, 2006) to provide us
with the relief we rely on to perform the menial task of existing. Perfume
advertising shows us what we could be how we could live and least importantly
how we could smell, the ‘reliance and craving’ we are subjected to during the
brief thirty second clip is what makes perfume on of the most profitable brands
around. Blue de Channel, a fragrance by Channel, channel have recently made an
advertisement, the advertisement features the perfume for exactly two seconds,
the rest of the advert is made up of one “beautiful” man in a room being asked
questions by a number of members of the press, the adverts concludes with the
man looking rather dashing uttering the lines “I’m not going to be the person
I’m expected to be any more”, despite no one knowing or caring who he is we are
encapsulated by this man. The advert is simply and blatantly has nothing to do
with perfume, but a ‘product which initially has no ‘meaning’ must be given
value’ (Judith Williamson, 2005, page 31).
This advert shows a good looking man being given the attention of the entire
room, the perfume, an over priced glass jar of smell, on its own cannot provide
us with an ideal of who we want to aspire to be. ‘ Women’s and men’s bodies too
these days are dismembered, packaged and used to sell everything’ (Jean Kilbourne, 2006) this is paramount
within the advertisement of perfume, a myth of glamour, and a myth that we subscribe
to. ‘A myth is not defined by the object of its message but by the way in which
it utters this message’ (Roland Barthes,
2000, page 109) this brings me back to my previous point that it is not the
product but the myth that sells the product, perfume adverts and the ideologies
that surround perfume adverts manipulates people to create a system that sells
commodities, people feel underwhelmed by the whole experience, as the hang over
from the night before takes hold and the sobering reality that you are not
Angelina Jolie, the dishevelled man lying adjacent is indeed not Brad Pritt and
you are still lying in the Ikea bed in your run down council property in
Swindon. Perfume is given a use-value, ‘use value the power to satisfy,
directly or indirectly a human desire’ (Gerald Allan Cohen, 2004,
page 418) perfume
advertisements translates the product into different consumer and human
relationships/emotions creating an ideology around the product. Perfume is
glamorous, beautiful and sexy which is what everyone would long to become, perfume
couldn’t make you any of these things. Perfume adverts are made in such a way it
conjures the idea of glamour, and therefore become glamorous and once this
connection has been created it inevitable will become an automatic acceptance
of our relationship with perfume and how as a social group will be controlled
into believing the myth. ‘Advertising performs much the same function in
industrial society as myth did in ancient society’ (Jean Kilbourne, 2006) Perfume and human emotion become interchangeable as they are of
equal value, because they are one in the same, it is the twisting of peoples personal
perception of there own lives that fuel the juggernaut that is the mass media.
We are encouraged to ‘buy more to seek our identity and fulfilment’ (Jean Kilbourne, 2006). It is human nature
to play the role of the naïve easily influenced docile body, have we been
indoctrinated for so long it is the normal. As a society do we resemble
Foucault’s description of the docile body, ‘a
body is docile that may be, used, transformed, and improved’ (M. Foucault,
1979, page 136) we are being improved in the eyes of the
holders of commodity, we are willing to role over and subscribe to the myth we
are being fed.
‘Advertisements must take into account not only the inherent
qualities and attributes of the products they are trying to sell, but also the
way in which they can make those properties mean something to us ...
Advertisements are selling us something besides consumer goods; in providing us
with a structure in which we, and those goods are interchangeable, they are
selling us ourselves.’ (Judith Williamson, 2005, page 13)
If
advertisement is selling us our selves, advertising is merely a reflection on
society and the culture we have created. Society is the beast within; that
advertising is merely keeping happy with what we want to here. Could it be that
we don’t want to be genuinely advertised to all, what we want to achieve in
life is to whiteness scandal and uproar. ‘We are surrounded by hundreds of
messages every day that link our deepest to products, trivializing our most
heartfelt emotions’ (Jean Kilbourne, 2006) Perhaps
that is the society we have created for our selves, people are constantly
looking for any one to make a mistakes, to slip up, its not only celebrities
that we want to see fall out of clubs or disgrace themselves ultimately trivialising
their existence. In a recent survey of five hundred children ‘fifty six present
believe the planet will not be as good a place to live when
they grow up’ (Roy Britt, 2009) this
says volumes about the way our world is built on false values and lies. In an
age full of phone hacking, big brother and global warming, to name a few things
denting human civilization, perhaps advertising in particular perfume
advertising is only mirror image on the debacle that we call twenty first
century society. ‘The important thing to remember about signs is that their
meaning can only be assessed in relation to their structure and their
structural relationships with other signs.’ (Gillian Dyer, 2009, page 98) if perfume
advertising is the sign, the structure it is to be considered against is
society, it is only relevant to the way we are and what we want to see and be
subjected to. If advertising is an assortment of lies and false reality it is only
because of the nature of our own culture and the mess we find our selves in
that it is like that at all. ‘Advertising encourages us not only to objectify
each other but to feel passion for products rather than our partners’ (Jean Kilbourne,
2006) is it not more likely that we have
no affection for our fellow inhabitants on this rock and therefore we take
solace in material good rather than people, as they can be so tricky to get
along with. It’s much easier to want to forget about your horrible life and
think believe you can be something better and someone more glamorous, perhaps
there is not a myth regarding the way perfume advertises, but due to the
society we have create advertising such as this seems more like escapism rather
than indoctrination. ‘The connection of a “thing” and an abstraction can lead
them to seem the same, in real life’ (Judith
Williamson, 2005, page 37). The connect we have with perfume advertising
and the ideas they encapsulate in comparison to real life, it can be seen that
the lines are blurred, between reality and what we would like to perceive as
our reality, but is this due to how we live our lives and not how we are instructed
to live our lives. Perfume advertisement therefore can only be considered as a
mirror of what we have created. Reality is what we perceive and what we want to
perceive is a better life, so we are only indoctrinating our selves rather than
being indoctrinated.
Throughout
this essay I have challenged my own opinions about the way I perceive perfume
advertisement, I have attempted to explore the two conflicting views on the
effect of advertising hopefully coming to a conclusion regarding my opinion of
the myth of glamour within perfume advertising. Does advertising change society or reflect it? Through my
investigation I have covered two ways of looking at how perfume is advertised,
we are the reason for advertising and the way we are advertised to. Society has
created a picture of itself and advertising agencies mealy play on this to sell
goods, glamour sells but only because want to be sold to society does indeed
strive to be bigger and better that it is, therefore it seems logical for to be
advertised in such away to allow to believe in a myth that is glamour. Buying
the product will not change you, but it could make you happier. If someone
willingly subscribes to the myth then they may get some sort of pleasure from
striving to be some one they’re not. Advertising has both changed society and
indeed mirrors it as well. Advertising is defiantly part of the reason we
believe and subscribe to a myth that we could be as glamorous as the products
suggest, but it is society and the dishevelled, consumerist, disposable lives
we live that is fuels this that keeps such advertising in business. The only
conclusion is that we subscribe to advertising because of the way society is
and society is the way it is because we subscribe to advertising.
Bibliography
Williamson, J. (2005) Decoding
Advertisement. London, UK, Marion Boyards.
Barthes, R. (2000) Mythologies.
London, UK, Vintage.
Berger, J. (1972) Ways
of Seeing. London, UK, Penguin Books.
Barnard, M. (2006)
Graphic Design as Communication. London, UK, Routledge.
Dyer, G. (2009) Advertising
as Communication. London, UK, Routledge.
Cohen, G, A. (2004) Karl
Marx Theory of History. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press.
Foucault, M. (1995) Discipline and Punish. New York, USA,
Random House Inc.
Britt, R (2009) Is
modern society ruining childhood. USA, livescience. http://www.livescience.com/7713-modern-society-ruining-childhood.html
(12.01.2012)
Unknown, (n.d) Semiotics
and Ideologies. Unknown. generation-online.
http://www.generation-online.org/c/fcformalism.htm. (16.01.2012)
Kilbourne, J. (2006) Jesus
is a Brand of Jeans. UK. Newint. http://www.newint.org/features/2006/09/01/culture/.
(13.01.2012)
